How Russia Bit More Than It Could Chew and Lost Syria

Russia’s intervention in Syria marked a critical moment in its efforts to reassert itself as a global power. Initially aimed at weakening the U.S. influence in the region, the military engagement revealed both the potential and limitations of Russia’s ambitions in the Middle East. 

Russia's primary goal in Syria is to expel the United States and weaken its influence in the Middle East, as part of a broader strategy to counter Western power in key geopolitical areas. Alongside Iran, Russia seeks to secure Bashar al-Assad’s regime and establish Syria as a strategic foothold in the Arab world and a gateway to the Mediterranean. This consolidates Russia's position as a dominant regional power while challenging U.S.-led coalitions and reinforcing its narrative as a global counterbalance to Western dominance. Furthermore, Russia's presence strengthens alliances with regional partners like Iran, forming a unified front against Western influence in one of the world’s most volatile regions.

The reason why Russia wants to achieve this goal is that by backing Assad, Russia solidifies its role as a key regional player, leveraging its influence beyond Syria to shape conflicts and support allies, enhancing its reputation as a reliable partner compared to the perceived unpredictability of U.S. foreign policy. Moreover, maintaining Assad’s regime secures access to strategic infrastructure, notably the Tartus naval base, providing a foothold in the Mediterranean to project military power and monitor trade routes. Furthermore, success in Syria also boosts Russia's global bargaining power, positioning it as a central actor in discussions on Middle Eastern stability, energy security, and counterterrorism, cementing its influence over the region's future. 

Russia attempted to achieve this goal by supporting Assad’s regime with extensive military intervention. At the height of Russia's intervention in Syria in 2017, Russia deployed around 6,000 troops, with even more stationing today at approximately 7,000. Russia also employed a considerable air fleet, including over two dozen Su-24 and Su-25 bombers, eight Su-30 fighter-bombers, and 12 Mi-24 and Ka-52 attack helicopters, which conducted over 34,000 combat sorties from 2015 to 2018. Additionally, Advanced systems like Iskander-M ballistic missiles, S-400 air defenses, and Pantsir and Tor systems were deployed to secure critical assets, particularly the Hmeimim air base. This approach, emphasizing airpower, precision strikes, and defensive measures, aimed to fortify Assad’s position, weaken opposition forces, and sustain Russia’s military presence. However, increased cargo plane activity in recent satellite imagery suggests preparations for partial troop redeployment or extraction. 

Contrary to the Russian goal, Russia’s intervention in Syria backfired by increasing U.S. involvement rather than weakening it. Instead of withdrawing, the U.S. expanded its presence, supporting Kurdish groups and rebel factions, escalating the conflict into a proxy war that complicated Russia’s objectives. The U.S. consolidated opposition forces, hindering Russia’s efforts to diminish American influence. This prolonged the conflict, drained Russian resources, and heightened tensions with local and Western powers. Ultimately, rather than reducing U.S. presence, Russia’s actions intensified the geopolitical struggle, resulting in a costly and extended conflict. 

Russia’s situation worsened even more in relation to its strategic goal in Syria with the outbreak of the war in Ukraine in 2022, which diverted Russia’s attention and resources from Syria to the Eastern European conflict. Key forces, notably the Wagner Group, were redeployed to Ukraine, creating a gap in ground operations in Syria. Additionally, Russian generals previously leading in Syria were reassigned, reducing leadership quality and operational oversight. This led to less coordinated and effective military efforts in Syria. Heavy equipment, such as tanks, artillery, and air defense systems, was also transferred to Ukraine, further weakening Russia's presence. But even more importantly, with over 750,000 casualties reported by the Ukrainian General Staff, Russia’s strained military left Syria under-resourced and vulnerable to regional power shifts. 

Russia's challenges in Syria were exacerbated even more by inefficiencies and corruption within the Assad regime. The Syrian military, plagued by poor morale, inadequate supplies, and insufficient training, relied heavily on Russian support to maintain control. General Valery Gerasimov and other Russian commanders recognized the Syrian forces’ inability to independently defend their territory. Corruption and mismanagement within the Syrian government further destabilized the situation, creating a fractured and unstable environment that hindered the execution of military operations. While Russia initially helped secure key territories for Assad, the Syrian military’s dependence on external aid highlighted the limits of Russia’s intervention, as resource shortages and internal dysfunction severely undermined operational effectiveness. 

In the final stages of the conflict, the rebel Islamist group Hayat Tahrir al-Sham overthrew Assad’s regime, marking a strategic failure for Russia. Putin’s reluctance to intervene directly during Assad’s most vulnerable phase underscored Russia’s diminished capacity to support its strategic ally, as it had long positioned itself as Assad’s primary backer. This failure highlighted the limits of Russia’s intervention and its broader challenges in maintaining influence in Syria. While initially successful in preventing Assad’s collapse, Russia ultimately failed to secure its long-term goals. The inability to sustain Assad damaged Russia’s credibility and reduced its regional influence, delivering a significant blow to its strategic objectives in the Middle East. 

Overall, Russia’s intervention in Syria, while stabilizing Assad’s regime initially, failed to achieve long-term goals. Shifting focus to Ukraine and inefficiencies in Syria’s government and military exposed Russia’s limited resources and influence. Unable to decisively support Assad in the conflict’s final stages, Russia’s overextension undermined its challenge to U.S. dominance. This failure underscores the limits of military power in volatile regions and the risks of overreaching across multiple conflicts.

‍