From Penal Battalions to Female Convicts: Russia’s Manpower Crisis Deepens

Today, we will discuss how the final months of 2024 have seen Russia's military suffering its highest casualty rates of the war, raising questions about the sustainability of its current offensive operations, as these staggering losses underscore the stark imbalance between the human cost and the modest territorial gains achieved in return.

In Pokrovsk, the contrast between losses and gains is striking. Russian forces have launched relentless offensives in this sector, making painstakingly slow progress while sustaining heavy casualties. Their initial reliance on frontal assaults left troops and armored vehicles vulnerable to well-prepared Ukrainian defenses, resulting in devastating losses with each successive wave. The Pokrovsk area has become emblematic of Russia's overall struggles, where marginal territorial gains come at an exorbitant cost, and fleeting increases in manpower only underscore the persistent inability to achieve meaningful and sustainable breakthroughs.

Reports from the frontlines suggest that Russian troops are increasingly relying on hastily conscripted personnel, penal battalions, and even female convicts to plug gaps in their ranks. These desperate measures underscore the depth of their manpower crisis, as does the Russian Ministry of Defense’s decision to increase conscription by 19 to 25 percent to compensate for rising losses. Yet even these efforts to gain around 1,200 recruits per day struggle to keep pace with their casualty rate and replace their losses.

The United Kingdom military intelligence service recently observed that Russian forces suffered record-high casualty rates in November 2024, with an average of 1,523 casualties per day – notably higher than Russia’s claimed recruitment of 1,200 new recruits per day. As if they aimed to achieve minimal gains at maximum cost, for all their sacrifices, Russian forces managed to seize just over 800 square kilometers of Ukrainian territory in November, amounting to roughly 53 casualties for every square kilometer gained. 

In the preceding months of September and October, the situation was similarly bleak: an estimated 80,000 casualties were incurred for 1,500 square kilometers of advances over the two months. These grinding offensives have yielded only minor tactical advances and have come nowhere close to achieving any of the Kremlin’s strategic objectives, such as taking full control of the Donetsk Oblast.

Russian forces’ inability to sustain these losses without destabilizing the Russian economy is another critical vulnerability. Recruitment efforts now directly compete with the lack of civilian labor force, with more and more cases of civilians being mobilized for the war efforts, straining an economy already grappling with inflation and labor shortages. Hidden mobilization efforts in the form of implicit conscription campaigns disguised as volunteer recruitment, with bigger and bigger sign-on bonuses promised with each month that passes —are barely managing to offset current losses, let alone provide reserves for future offensives. Russian industrial capacity also faces severe limitations against heavy equipment losses, with reports suggesting the production and repair of only 25 T-90 tanks per month.

With daily casualty rates peaking at over 1,500 troops in November, and total losses for the month exceeding 45,000 soldiers, the Russian military faces mounting challenges in maintaining its war efforts, despite the claims of Russian Minister of Defense Belousov that they had recruited over 427,000 volunteer servicemembers in 2024. While these claims remain unverified, the Institute for the Study of War commented that the Kremlin's strategy of throwing more troops into the fray while accepting unsustainable casualty rates risks long-term depletion of its military potential. The Russian defense apparatus is stretched thin, relying on Soviet-era equipment, penal recruits, and strained logistics to sustain its campaigns. Over time, these factors will likely erode Russia’s ability to mount effective offensives, leaving its forces vulnerable to Ukrainian counterattacks.

As the war continues, the Kremlin must weigh the diminishing returns of its human-wave tactics against the growing likelihood of collapse in its military and economic systems. The current approach may yield minor tactical gains but is unlikely to secure the strategic objectives necessary to justify such enormous losses. For Ukraine, this dynamic offers opportunities to exploit Russian weaknesses and maintain pressure on an overstretched adversary even if, at the same time, Ukraine is dependent on Western military aid to be able to deal such damage to the enemy in the long term.

‍