Russia’s role in the Israeli-Iran conflict

Since Russia was kicked out from its military bases in Syria, it has been struggling to maintain its influence in the Middle East. 

As tensions between Israel and Iran escalate, Moscow is forced to redefine its strategy as a key mediator in regional conflicts to avoid further geopolitical setbacks while persevering its regional standing and countering Western influence.

The goal of Russia is to position itself as a central diplomatic player between Israel and Iran, using military leverage to maintain influence. By navigating between both sides, Moscow seeks to reinforce its regional importance, counterbalance Western dominance, and protect its security interests without confrontation. 

The reason why Russia wants to achieve this goal is that maintaining a foothold in the Middle East is essential for its strategic ambitions. Moscow played a critical role in the regional security dynamics, leveraging its military bases to influence conflicts and maintain its presence. 

If it loses this role, Russia risks diminishing its ability to shape regional conflicts, making arbitration of the Israel-Iran crisis a vital means of retaining relevance. Additionally, stabilizing the region is crucial for protecting Russian interests and countering the threat to its influence. It also allows Russia to push back against its growing diplomatic isolation from the West.

In order to achieve this goal, Moscow has prioritized military and strategic maneuvers, leveraging its presence in the region, arms deals with Tehran, and cooperation with regional partners such as Egypt and the United Arab Emirates to reinforce its influence. Additionally, it has publicly called for de-escalation at the United Nations while maintaining ties with both Israel and Iran. By positioning itself as a necessary negotiator, Russia seeks to preserve its status as a power broker.

As a result of these actions, Russia maintained diplomatic relationships with Israel and Iran while avoiding direct involvement in their conflict. However, skepticism from Israel has grown due to Moscow’s ambiguous stance on Iranian military activities, while Iran has also expressed doubt over Russia’s willingness to deactivate its air defenses to accommodate Israeli strikes in Syria. 

As a result, Russia’s attempt to balance both sides has started to backfire, generating distrust from both Israel and Iran. Neither side views Moscow as a reliable partner, increasing pressure to push Russia out of the region. Simultaneously, Western nations have continued pressuring Russia over its involvement in regional security affairs, further complicating its balancing act.

After Syria expelled Russia from key military bases, Moscow lost its role as a regional arbitrator, weakening its diplomatic leverage. Without a military presence, Russia could no longer enforce its position, leaving a power vacuum. 

Israel, free from Russian interference, intensified airstrikes on Iranian-linked targets in Syria. 

At the same time, Iran, sensing Russia's inability to reinforce its proxies and therefore dictate Iran the terms of engagement, grew bolder in pursuing its regional ambitions. This shift allowed both Israel and Iran to directly confront each other in Syria, with Israel escalating strikes without fear of Russian retaliation. 

As Iran expanded its presence, Russia's stance as a reliable intermediary crumbled, and Israel had less incentive to engage diplomatically.

Being weakened by the sudden regional power shifts, Russia is struggling to maintain influence in Syria after losing its military bases. To salvage its diminishing role, it is pressuring the new Syrian government to grant limited access to former bases, offering economic and military incentives. However, this effort is hindered by Russia’s reduced leverage, as Syria now increasingly looks to other powers for support. Lacking direct control over key sites, Moscow relies on covert operations and private military contractors to sustain influence but remains unable to counter Israel’s actions or curb Iran’s expansion. As hostilities between Israel and Iran escalate, Russia’s military credibility erodes further. 

In a last-ditch effort, it has deepened ties with Iran, risking overdependence on Tehran’s regional ambitions. Simultaneously, Russia is engaging Egypt and the United Arab Emirates to secure logistical routes, but its inability to maintain these partnerships further weakens its position as a mediator in the Israel-Iran conflict. Should these alliances falter, Russia risks pushing regional players closer to NATO, further isolating itself. This isolation reduces Russia's ability to influence both Israel and Iran, leaving a vacuum where Moscow once played a balancing role. 

Overall, Russia’s expulsion from Syria has forced it into a delicate geopolitical revision, relying more on diplomacy than military presence to maintain its influence. While it still remains an important regional actor for the time being, its ability to mediate effectively is increasingly challenged by shifting alliances and Western countermeasures. If Moscow fails to secure a lasting foothold in the evolving conflict, its risks losing its strategic grip in the Middle East, further weakening its global standing.

‍